tsunami-of-lava:

so this top-rated literary blog just believed this anonymous person when they said showing james’ book excerpt was approved by the publisher or whatever?? like this person didn’t provide any personal info and has no credibility whatsoever and the blog didn’t get suspicious that it sounded too good to be true? how did they know it was really written by james? how did they know it was approved by the publisher? why didn’t they fact-check? how much does pb want me to suspend my belief?